The New Paradigm
vol. IV, Number 11

Tuesday, May 1, 2001

J. Harmon Grahn, Editor



Back to The New Paradigm Index


Dear Friends,

This is the season in which many hearts turn toward thoughts and feelings of Love. Accordingly, we have two synchronistically related essays to share this time, on Love and Sex: one by Yours Truly, to let You know how much "I Love You," and one by the "Hosts of Heaven" "On Sexuality and Reproduction - Terra Style." There are plenty of words to follow, so without further preamble, rest assured that...


These are magic words in any language, are they not? Yet how much pain, anguish, and human turmoil have been associated with them! They are words we all long to hear - yet it's not necessarily "good news" when we do. Why is that? I submit that uttered within an "old paradigm" context, or that of the existing genetic mind,1 "I love you" does not necessarily mean exactly the same thing to the speaker as to the listener.

To the listener, "I love you" often means:

  • "He or she loves me, admires me, respects me, cares for me, above all others;

  • "I can expect special attention and favors from he or she who has told me shim's love;

  • "Shim who loves me will never love another as shim loves me, will always love me as shim does now, and bears a life-long commitment to me, and to our love relationship."

If these feelings are reciprocated, "I love you" is traditionally thought and expected to be "Good News," and to lead to the pleasant isles of "Happily Ever After." Yet, how often are such expectations actually fulfilled?


To the speaker, "I love you" often means:

  • "I find in you qualities I cherish, admire, and to which I am attracted; ("Sex-appeal" often plays a larger part in this than either party may wish consciously to acknowledge, particularly, maybe, when viewed from the masculine perspective; "earning power" may be the corresponding "hook" from the feminine point of view.)

  • "I desire you to share with me exclusively these (sexual / fiscal) charms of yours which are the objects of my desire;

  • "I am committed to go to some lengths to motivate (woo) you to give me exclusive access to the (sexual / fiscal) objects of my desire which you possess, and to agree to grant such access to no one else;

  • "I am prepared to enter into a contractual agreement with you to this effect."

Again, if the feelings are reciprocated, such "love contracts" are routinely drawn up between agreeing parties, under the name of "marriage," and the mutual expectation is that they will be perpetually honored by both parties, who will thence forth dwell together in the isles of "Happily Ever After." Why is it such expectations are so seldom fulfilled?


I submit to your consideration the proposition that the reason these happy mutual expectations are so seldom fulfilled is that they are products of the "old paradigm" / genetic mind scheme of hierarchical ownership - which is based in turn upon the evolution / saviorship model of existence,2 and is (in my opinion) fundamentally unsound. I propose further that vastly improved performance may be anticipated from widespread adoption of the "new paradigm" transformation / mastership model of existence;2 in which there are no hierarchical or ownership relationships among unique Sovereign Beings. In that model, "I Love You" is totally "weightless," because it lays no burden whatsoever upon its object.

In a "new paradigm" context, all Individuals are mutually-acknowledged and respected Sovereigns, and the last thing any Sovereign (who understands what Sovereignty is) would want to do is anything to compromise the Sovereignty of another Sovereign - because any such compromise likewise compromises one's own Sovereignty, automatically, and unavoidably. Therefore, between Sovereigns, "I Love You" means:

  • "I see in You qualities I recognize and appreciate in My Self;

  • "My Love for You is entirely My responsibility, and makes no claim upon You whatsoever, for I Love You for what You are, or for what I perceive You to be, not for what I expect You to do, or be, for Me;

  • "My Love for You is such that I allow and encourage You to be and become anything it pleases You to be or become, for Your dynamic growth and evolution are what I Love about You most: because that is what I most Love about My Self."

This is Unconditional Love. It asks nothing, expects nothing, and can therefore never be disappointed; and can never be a burden to You, its object. If such Love is reciprocated, fine; it may become the basis of a beautiful, passionate relationship between or among Sovereigns. If not, fine: nothing lost, nothing diminished, no disappointment, no burden, no obligation. For this Love is given without condition, restraint, or "attached strings." It springs voluntarily and without obligation from the heart of Shim Who Loves - and expands "to the ends of the universe," without obstruction or limitation of any kind.

Furthermore, Unconditional Love is not exclusive. If I Love You, which is entirely My choice and responsibility, and asks nothing in return from You, likewise I am entirely at liberty to Love as well anyone else who inspires such Love in Me. My heart of Love may conceivably grow so large and expansive as potentially to embrace "All That Is," including every "thing" and every "one," without condition or exception. This, I take it, would put "Me" in pretty close alignment with the Heart of First Source, and so may be held as an "evolutionary goal" on our Cosmic journey. It seems to me reasonable to expect that each of us will reach this boundless and unconditional state of heart eventually, regardless of our individual condition at the "present moment," for "There is no other direction we can go."3


What about instances in which Unconditional Love is accompanied by the emotional / limbic charge of sexual attraction; as is usually the case in most "old paradigm" contexts in which the words, "I love you" are exchanged? Well, I suppose every Sovereign will have to answer this question for Shimself. For Me, given that I am a Sovereign, and You are a Sovereign, and I find You sexually attractive, the last thing I am going to do with that (i.e. never) is anything to burden Your Sovereignty. That is, I am not going to attempt to "seduce" You, or coerce You, or attempt to maneuver You into a situation in which You are calculated more probably to grant Me sexual favors. If it develops that We find Each Other mutually attractive sexually, I have every confidence that such attraction will take its exquisitely natural course, to Our mutual satisfaction, without compromising the Sovereignty of Either of Us.

Moreover, another "thing" I am not going to do is attach a personal claim upon Your Sovereign sexual choices; nor will I recognize any such claim upon Mine. This is not actually "another thing," but is simply one narrow aspect of the general policy among Sovereigns of honoring One Another's Sovereignty. I mention it in particular only because of the prevailing "old paradigm" habitual expectation that sexual relationships are, or ought to be, exclusive or proprietary. I see no reason for such an expectation, and I find it entirely inimical to harmonious relationships among Sovereigns.

Does this encourage unbridled promiscuity? "License?" "Lust?" "Decadence?" Not particularly, in my opinion. For one thing, is there anything "wrong" with "unbridled promiscuity," among Sovereigns Who relish sexual variety? Says who? "License?" Without Hierarchy4 there can be no "license," which is an artificial prerogative arrogated by the Hierarchy and sustained and promoted by the Hierarchy-engineered genetic mind. "Lust" is a pejorative term denoting sexual attraction; which is fundamental, not only to human biological propagation and species evolution. Anything "wrong" with that? "Decadence?" That's a subjective call, which anyone is at liberty to make at any time, about anything. However, in a civilization of Sovereigns, no one is entitled to impose such judgments upon anyone else without compromising shim's own Sovereignty. "Judge not, that ye be not judged," about covers the case.

While we're at it, let's explore this matter of "lust" just a little bit further. Is there anything "wrong" with engaging sexually for no "higher" reason than "pure lust?" And maybe even paying for said engagement? If so, then there must also be something "wrong" with feeling the urge for a good meal, and going to a first-class restaurant (or to a "hamburger joint," for that matter) and paying a skilled (or semiskilled) chef to prepare it - all for no "higher" reason than that one has an appetite for a superb (or at least a filling) meal. I'm sorry, but I've got to say, some of the notions masses of people have been accepting without question for thousands of years, upon examination turn out to be so bizarre as to defy comprehension. How can anyone be taken in by such superstition? But this is only My Sovereign Opinion, and has no priority over Your Sovereign Opinion, should they happen to differ. Your mileage may vary.

In actual practice, all this may be going somewhat to extremes. "Unbridled promiscuity" may be fine for those who relish it; however, this does not preclude longstanding, stable, monogamous relationships for those who relish that pattern instead. Accordingly, in an earlier essay, I wrote:

It may even be that to a casual observer, very little difference is evident between a typical "new paradigm" community and its "old paradigm" counterpart; for only one difference is crucial: in a "new paradigm" society no one owns anyone else. That is all. The rest takes its course following the preferences (i.e. what works) for all participants. Finding what works may require a little, or a lot, of mutual self-discovery and/or experimentation. This is hardly surprising, for no one has ever yet experienced life on Earth in a "new paradigm" civilization. It will be up to "new paradigm" Sovereign Individuals to invent and/or discover "new paradigm" civilization.5

In general (in my opinion), in a civilization of Sovereigns, anyone is at liberty to invent or adopt whatever standards of behavior seem to shim appropriate, and to live up to them if possible. However, no one is entitled to decide for another Sovereign the standards of behavior she or he "ought" to meet. To attempt to impose one's standards upon another is simultaneously to invite the imposition of others' standards upon oneself - which is contrary to what Sovereignty is. Prejudice the Sovereignty of another, in other words, and you automatically prejudice your own. That's the deal.

Well, okay (replies the Skeptic). But what about family, and children, and social continuity from one generation to the next? Are these not more important than the sexual gratification of a population of hedonists?

Again, "population of hedonists" is a subjective judgment; which in a civilization of Sovereigns anyone may hold as an opinion without jeopardizing shim's Sovereignty - so long as one does not attempt to impose it upon others.

As to children, family, and social continuity, these were dealt with at some length in two editions of the recent "New Beginnings" series of essays.6 I can add the opinion that the so-called "nuclear family" is considerably smaller than the "minimum atomic unit" for a healthy human society. A society composed of isolated "nuclear families," typically consisting of "Father, Mother, and Children," no matter now numerous or densely packed these "social units" may be, is in the process of self-annihilation. Many societies in the so-called "civilized world" are now in a critically advanced state of disintegration, as evidenced, among a great many equally alarming "symptoms," by the high proportion of "single parent households" in our contemporary demography. Even the "nuclear family" is not within reach for increasing numbers among us. This condition (in my opinion) portends the rapid approach of "the end of the end" for such societies, and I suggest that the "extended family" of a long vanished era (at least in America) is more like the "minimum atomic unit" for a healthy human society.

In order to be healthy and viable, in my opinion, a society should consist of all age groups, from the very young to the very old, in a richly mixed dynamic amalgam. In particular, such a healthy society will not be segregated by age, e.g. with children incarcerated in schools (prisons), senior citizens incarcerated in retirement villages (prisons), young professionals incarcerated in industrial parks (prisons) and suburban developments (prisons). The result of this extreme segregation, in contemporary so-called "society," is that people of different generations very seldom have experiences in common, from one day, week, or year to the next. People who do not share common experiences have no social cohesion. They are simply a "mass of people," not a society at all. Such a "mass of people" is very convenient for the Hierarchy to manage and control, but as a "society" it is dead.

Therefore, in order to make healthy provision for the birthing and rearing of children, and for fluid continuity from one generation to the next, contemporary so-called "society" needs to undergo a rather profound and perhaps even "wrenching" metamorphosis. This is happening, and will continue to happen at an accelerating pace, for the patterns that have been so painstakingly put into place by the Hierarchy, for the exclusive purpose of social control, are manifestly failing now at an alarming rate. The time will soon come, for instance, when parents on a massive scale will remove their children from public schools; simply because schools have become places where stir-crazed children murder each other. This is the salient point as regards contemporary so-called "education," regardless how much the Hierarchy yammers about the need for more stringent "gun control." How many more "Columbines"7 will it take before people start awakening to the fact that they literally endanger the lives and health of their own children by sending them to school? My guess is, not very many.

If parents start taking their children out of school, however, this implies they will also commence organizing their lives differently than has been "conventional" in the past. It means taking more direct responsibility in the rearing of their own children. It may mean relying less upon the Hierarchy, and more upon themselves and one another in pursuance of these vital social and familial functions.

Fortunately, children of all ages are natural-born "learning machines," "information sponges;" so "home schooling" turns out to be vastly less challenging than most people who have not attempted it probably imagine. On the basis of personal experience, I can recommend three simple, virtually effortless strategies for raising "superior" (i.e. not stunted) children to mature young adulthood:

  1. Take your children out of school;

  2. Teach them to read;

  3. Remove all televisions from your home.

That is all. That's the whole program. If you can manage anything "extra," such as visits to museums, concerts, ballet, opera, trips to the mountains or the beach, music, dance, carpentry, machine shop, animal husbandry, fly fishing, gardening, "messing about in boats," anything else you or your children can think of that they actually find stimulating and interesting, and fun, it's icing on the cake. Mainly, stay out of the way! Your children don't need to be "edutained." That's what "play" is for. Ever hear of it? It's what kids do naturally. It stimulates their creative imaginations, and provides infinitely variable exercise for their minds and bodies. Unfortunately, its beneficial effects are almost entirely neutralized by the presence of television, so item c, above, is vital.

To some, item b, teach them to read, may seem somewhat daunting. How do you do that? Simply, read to them. Children love it. When they begin to discover how much information is available to them in printed form, believe me, they will learn to read - and commence a life-long exploration of the endless chain of topics that interest them.

All this becomes vastly easier as a society evolves in which children have increasing access to adults of all ages, engaged in a mounting variety of fascinating pursuits. As already mentioned, this has been discussed at considerable length in prior essays.6 A society in which adults work at home, children learn at home, and the home becomes a hub of interaction with the surrounding community - the extended family - it seems to me is a society most likely to be healthy, vital, and alive with enriching interest for all participants. This, in broad strokes, is the context in which I visualize the freest play of Love between and among participants in a healthy, well balanced society.

Which introduces another element of universal concern in the process of raising children to balanced, stable adulthood. Puberty, and the process of becoming a sexually active, and responsible, adult, is a "rite of passage," one way or another, in the life course of every Individual. This is something we do not do at all well in the so-called "civilized world," and which many, or at least some, "primitive cultures" do much more gracefully. I must apologize here for not being able to locate a book I wish to cite, but of which I can remember neither the author nor the title. It was written by a contemporary "Native American"8 and described, among other things, the process whereby he "became a man" within his tribe.

He wrote that at the age of 15 he was introduced to three or four "Fire Women" in his tribe, one of whom was selected as the woman to initiate him sexually. She took him into her home for a period of time, possibly a week or two (here my memory fails me), and basically tutored him in the ways of women and sex. It was an "assignment" he (and I'm sure she) enjoyed immensely, and set him upon a very sound footing in all his subsequent relations (at least sexually) with women. When I read that, I was amazed at what a profoundly sensible, healthy practice this must be; and how vastly superior it is to the corresponding clandestine sexual initiations that take place among teenagers, typically in the back seats of parked automobiles on "Prom Night," in our so-called "civilization."

And so I formed the wish (yet to be realized, and it's getting quite late) for some sort of "Fire Woman" to become available for the similar sexual initiation of "my sons," and if possible, a corresponding "Fire Man" for the initiation of "my daughter," should any of them desire such initiation. Unfortunately, in our culture, no such social mechanism exists, and I can only harbor the probably vain hope that "my children" will somehow fare better in their respective sexual initiations than I did in a brief encounter with a Market Street prostitute in San Francisco. (I place "my children" in "quotes," by the way, because they are not really "mine." They belong to themselves, and to First Source. I have only acted in the minor and not flawless role of parent, guardian, and shepherd through the early years of their respective Cosmic journeys in their contemporary incarnations.)

The whole issue of "teenage sex" is treated very creatively in Conversations With God, and is discussed at some length in these pages in a prior essay.9 In general, it seems to me quite sensible for the elders in a society to be much more dynamically involved in the rearing of the young than is the pattern in the "civilized world." That is, if children are born to youngsters in the course of their early sexual explorations, society is so arranged that elders are willing, able, and available to assist in raising such children, at the request, and to the extent desired by the biological parents. In such a society, no child enters the world unwanted, unloved, or uncared for, regardless of the disposition or maturity of shim's parents; for the entire community, not the "nuclear family," is the fundamental "atomic social unit."

To those of a more or less "Puritan" persuasion, this may sound like a formula for encouraging sexual irresponsibility, along with "'unbridled promiscuity,' 'license,' 'lust,' 'decadence,'" etc., as discussed above. In contemporary so-called "society," such results might indeed obtain in some cases. However, in this discussion, what is being visualized occurs within the context of a society of Sovereigns, and I expect the example displayed by mature, loving, responsible Sovereign adults and elders to have such a profound effect upon the incoming stream of adolescents and young adults as to render practically all "negative consequences" moot.

The preceding, and what follows, focuses largely upon some of the sexual aspects of the meaning of "I Love You;" not because sex is the only important aspect of Love, or of Life, human or otherwise. Clearly, as I have stated elsewhere, we are far more than "sexual beings," and our relationships are far more than sexual as well. However, on the basis of considerable introspection, I conclude that the nature of our sexual relationships is a profound indicator of the nature of all our relationships, of all kinds: with one another, with our planet Earth, with "all of life," i.e. with First Source.10

Synchronistically, while in the midst of writing this, another text came my way which seems to me to carry this discussion virtually into an entirely higher dimension; so I want to conclude these remarks by reiterating the main theme that among Sovereigns, "I Love You" means:

"I Love My Self, and I see My Self reflected in You, possibly magnified, or otherwise enhanced. This is My vision, and My responsibility, and neither asks nor expects anything in return from You, nor encumbers in any way Your unbridled liberty to be or become whatever it pleases You to be or become."

...Or words to that effect. That, anyway, is what I mean when I say "I Love You." When or if such Unconditional Love is reciprocated, it is so entirely at the voluntary discretion of the Object(s), Who thereby also become the Subject(s), of such Love. The result is a dynamic dance of creative harmony and mutually stimulated inspiration that potentially quite indescribably transcends conventional "Valentine's Day" or "Soap Opera" notions of the meaning of "I love you." For elaboration along one of many possible "points of departure," read on.


Love & Light,
Harmon


_____________________________________

1. The Genetic Mind: Glossary definition quoted in full in "Wingmakers, Revisited, Part III," boldface emphasis added.

2. Models of Existence: Glossary definition quoted in full in "Wingmakers, Revisited, Part II," boldface emphasis added.

3. From an Excerpt from Habitat of Soul, Chamber 21, quoted at WingMakersTM: The Ancient Arrow Project, preamble to Chapter Five, DISCLOSURES, p. 122; quoted in turn in "Wingmakers, Revisited, Part I."

4. Hierarchy: Glossary definition quoted in full in "Wingmakers, Revisited, Part II," boldface emphasis added. See also, "New Beginnings, Part V," vol. IV #10, 4/15/01, for a penetrating look at the Hierarchy, in the context of disclosures discussed in the "WingMakers, Revisited" series.

5. See "New Beginnings, Part IV," vol. IV #6, 2/14/01.

6. See "New Beginnings, Part II," a discussion of possible approaches to "new paradigm" learning, as opposed to "old paradigm" education; and "New Beginnings, Part IV," a consideration of human relationships in a "new paradigm" civilization.

7. See "Education," vol. II #13, 5/21/99, for a discussion of the implications of the massacre at Columbine High School, Littleton, Colorado, U.S.A., 20 April 1999.

8. Verrrry peculiar term, "Native American." Why does it apply to certain Individuals, who happen to have been born on the North American continent through an ancestry that allegedly immigrated here from Asia across the Bearing Strait several thousand years ago; and not to my Self, who was born on the North American continent through an ancestry that allegedly immigrated here from Europe two or three generations ago? What exactly is the "distinguishing characteristic" that sets us apart from one another and encourages us to treat ourselves, and one another, as virtually different species? Are we not all descended ultimately from "Immigrants From Outer Space," if a large enough sweep of time is factored in? You may not think so, and you're welcome to think what you like. To me, however, the idea is "infinitely" more plausible than the prevailing myth that our ancestors were hatched "by accident" in an ocean of "primordial soup" some 3.8 × 109 years ago.

9. See the concluding paragraphs of "Eros and Agape," vol. II #14, 6/17/99, for a discussion of the practice of lifting the burden from young parents of children rearing children born to them, and allowing it to be dynamically shared by mature elders.

10. See "My Central Message," WingMakers First Source Volume I, attributed to First Source; quoted in full in "Wingmakers, Revisited, Part III."


"I Love You"
copyright 2001 by J. Harmon Grahn.
Verbatim copying and redistribution are permitted
in any medium provided this notice is preserved.

* * * * * * * * * * * *

Dear Friends,

For quite some time now I have wanted to bring to your attention the materials presented at the Operation Terra Web site. This, in my perception, is another myth11 in the making, which I suspect will find considerable interest among those who resonate with The New Paradigm and/or with the "WingMakers Myth." The piece below is the latest to date of a sequence of channeled messages; which, if you find resonance with what follows, I recommend you read in their entirety.

The underlying, or overarching premise of the "Operation Terra" messages is that planet Earth, and all resident life forms are in the process of "spiritual, or vibrational ascension;" which among other things, means the physical 3-D planet is growing uninhabitable for biological life. This is not deemed a "bad thing," for Earth, or for biological life generally; it is simply part of a process we are going through at this stage of our Cosmic evolution. Another part of this process is a "splitting off" of various "realities" for those attuned to them; with the result that each individual finds shimself upon a path, and experiencing a "reality," that is perfectly appropriate to shim's nature, choices, and purpose.

The "Operation Terra" messages from the "Hosts of Heaven" are represented as being addressed specifically to those who resonate with them, and describe the "reality" that "we" are allegedly moving toward at the present time, and will be experiencing directly in the near-term future. This involves our eventual evacuation from Earth, and colonization of Terra, a planetary counterpart said to exist in a "higher dimension," or at a "higher frequency" than those to which we are attuned at present.

Whatever you may think of this scenario, speaking for myself, I have not encountered anything on the Operation Terra Web site with which I do not resonate profoundly. I read what is written, and I keep hearing my Inner Self saying, "yes, Yes, YES!" As to the pending evacuation of Earth, and colonization of Terra, I have nothing to say, "good" or "bad," about it. These claims lie entirely outside of my (currently accessible) experience, and mostly outside my imaginative capabilities. I do not reject the claims as "too amazing to be," because I have learned that there is nothing "too amazing to be." On the other hand, I have no point of personal reference upon which to base a confirmation (or denial) of the claim that Earth is to be evacuated, and Terra colonized, in the experience of contemporary residents of planet Earth. I simply do not know. We will see when, or if, it happens.

So I leave it to you. In any event, the following message "just happens" to synchronize exquisitely with the preceding essay, because it addresses the topic of "Sexuality and Reproduction - Terra Style," from a highly elevated spiritual perspective. In a sense, the preceding essay speaks from "out of the Dark," as the voice of one groping his way toward the Light. What follows speaks from "out of the Light" from the perspective of high spiritual entities reaching into our "dark world" with endeavors to stimulate and encourage our ascent Lightward, and Godward. I hope you find it meaningful, uplifting, and enjoyable.


Love & Light,
Harmon


_____________________________________

11. See "Creation Myths," vol. III #12, 11/5/00, for a general discussion of myths, and the vital part they play in virtually everyone's daily life.


* * * * * * * * * * * *


From: Lyara lyara@operationterra.com
Operation Terra  http://www.operationterra.com
Channeled by Lyara


ON SEXUALITY AND REPRODUCTION - TERRA STYLE

April 14, 2001


Well, now. In our last conversation, we spoke to you about the oneness that you will experience on Terra. This will be your constant experience, and you will KNOW yourself as being part of everything you perceive--be it infinitesimally small or as vast as an entire universe. Therefore, the primary reason for the 3D human sexual behavior will not be present.

What IS the primary reason for your sexual behavior? When analyzed down to its root, it is primarily an attempt to escape the prison of being contained in one body, of seeking to somehow breach that boundary of skin and to attempt to merge with another. Now, we are aware that many times the sexual act is not used to JOIN two people, so much as it is the inflicting of one's power over another, but that is a distortion and misappropriation of the sexual energy, as you will soon see.

Rather than condemn the present patterns, we wish to first draw a picture for you of how it will be on Terra--not only for the human species, but for all life forms that have the ability to join in sexual ways. Then, by contrast, you will be able to gain a sense of how your present experience does not satisfy and provides only temporary relief from your isolation and separation from all things.

You will also see how those practices that seek to escape from the sexual function, such as celibacy and monasticism, are an evasion of life in its fullest expression. That is not to say that there is nothing to be gained by them, but we prefer to put before you what life is like when you are in full consciousness and not struggling to repress your natural, God-given faculties in order to transcend them.

So, let us begin this discussion by reminding you that on Terra, you will be in total oneness with all of Creation. You will be immersed in a sea of consciousness that from your present perspective would appear to be surreal and dreamlike--not unlike some of the states one experiences on certain drugs, such as opium and its relatives. However, it will be your constant state, and therefore one simply adapts to it as being the norm and picks up from there.

On Terra, all things are in total balance with the whole, and reproduction occurs within that context. No flower blooms, no animal is born, without there being a clear and necessary "reason" for its coming into being, with regard to the whole. All things that reproduce by the combining of gametes (sperm and ova in their various forms) only do so when the whole demands it of them, in order to perpetuate and maintain the balance.

It sounds very complicated, but we assure you that it is the only truly natural way for it to be. What you see in your present reality is so distorted from what is natural that you cannot imagine what "natural" (i.e. in keeping with the inherent NATURE of things) is really like.

On Terra, reproduction is one function and it is separate from the sexual function. In your present reality, they are so intertwined and so out of balance with Nature and what is natural that they are often confused for one another. In many of your religions, both desire and sexuality are feared and held in mistrust. You are taught that they are something "sinful" or "wild" or "uncivilized" that has to be controlled in one way or another.

However, when a natural function is repressed, just like when the flow of a stream is blocked, it WILL seek another outlet, and that is exactly what you see in your present world. The natural functions have become twisted and distorted and grossly misunderstood in every aspect of your present civilization, regardless of geography or so-called "enlightened" approaches to the problem, which is really a symptom of the experience of separation.

On Terra, you will be one with everyone and everything, all the way out into the far reaches of the cosmos. You will live on a world in which everything is in total balance and shares in the existence and consciousness of everything else. If you are already in full union with everything, where does desire fit into the picture?

Desire is the engine behind all creativity, be it to create a painting, a piece of music, an elegant mathematical equation, or to create another life. Desire is what drives the evolution of the cosmos. The Creator's desire to experience everything is what leads It to CREATE everything!

At its root, your desire is the outpicturing of the Creator's desire to experience everything, through the mechanism of the interaction of all the parts of Its Creation. This interaction is most acutely experienced through the faculty of touch. You can look at something and interact with it visually. You can share your thoughts and feelings with another, either verbally or telepathically. You can experience through your physical senses of hearing and smell, but none of these communicates experience as fully as the sense of touch. You can use your imagination to create an experience that approaches what it would be like to touch something, but there really is no substitute for the actual touching.

In order to progress to the higher levels of being, one must complete with the levels below it. Although you are the embodied aspects of the Elohim and have DESCENDED into matter, you still can only imagine the "next step" on the journey back to Source in terms of your present experience--that of a human being, clothed in skin, and seeking to break out of the prison of separation consciousness. Therefore, you can only imagine a "next step," and that is how we will frame this. In a future discussion, we will talk about how you aren't really "going" anywhere, but for now, let us continue the exploration of our topic today.

The sense of touch is where you, as human beings, are most starved. And yet, if you seek to touch from that place of hunger and not from a place of already being filled with love, you only perpetuate your distress, and you get caught up in either having to seek again or remain in the loneliness and isolation of your prison cell--your physical body, your container--the thimble that you wear around the fingertip of your Oversoul that is inserted into your present time-space locus. Let that sink in for a moment, and let that awareness of all the lives in which you sought to fill your emptiness and were unfulfilled in your seeking come back to you now. Let it sink in, and let it go. That is all coming to an end for you now.

On Terra, every life form that reproduces by sexual means is mated. Every life form in that category is paired with its twin--its counterpart--what we call the dyad. Each Oversoul is complete within itself, just as the Creator is complete within Itself. There is no division into parts or genders, but in Its desire to experience everything, the Creator divided Itself into many parts that could then seek to unify back together again, and then--having accomplished that--would be divided up into an entirely new Creation--what could be viewed as the exhale and the inhale of the Creator's breath. First the exhalation--the breathing out into form, and then the inhalation--the coalescing of form back into the formlessness that gave rise to it in the first place.

The dyad is really the first level of the Creator (the monad) dividing itself into parts. This happens at all levels of the Creation, but for now we will keep our focus on the most apparent form of that--the twin, the counterpart that is the "other part" that each part seeks to find and unify with. We will call this part the "mate" of the other.

Mating is not just for reproduction. Mating is the act of unifying with one's mate, and reproduction is reserved for those times when a new being or unit is required for the balance of the whole. Population levels on Terra will remain fairly stable, once the colonization is complete. It will take some time to accomplish that, but once it is complete, those forms that leave Terra in one way or another will be replaced by others, and thereby maintain the balance of the whole.

As humans, you will have very long lifespans and be capable of reproducing throughout your entire adult existence. Therefore, in order to maintain the proper reproductive rate, gametes (sperms and ova) will only be produced when there is the complete set of circumstances present that require the creation of another life form. That is "birth control" in its natural form, at the highest level of knowing. We will address the issue of birthing in another conversation, but for now let us return to our topic for today.

The bodies you now occupy are not the bodies you will have on Terra. The bodies you now occupy will transform into the kind of body that you would consider one of a god or goddess, because of its physical perfection and beauty. The physical senses you now have are very crude compared to those you will have then.

Just as you cannot make a fine drawing with a pencil that is shaped like a log, you cannot experience the fineness of sensuality that will be available to you on Terra with the coarseness of your present physical senses. Note the relationship between sensuality and senses. Just as sexuality is the expression of the sexual function, sensuality is the expression of the sensual (pertaining to the senses) function. Sensuality is intertwined with sexuality because sexuality involves the senses for its proper expression.

All of the senses are engaged in the sexual function, both the physical ones and the ones you would call "subtle"--your intuitive, mental, and emotional ones. Those of you who have been fortunate enough to have a glimpse of a full sexual experience know this, but unfortunately that is the exception rather than the rule, and just as your cultures have labeled sexuality as something to be feared and controlled, sensuality has likewise been condemned to repression and condemnation.

On Terra, you will be freed of all constraints--especially economic ones--and you will be in full consciousness, blessed with lives measured in the hundreds of years, so you will be able to allow yourself the full expression of all of your senses and your sexuality, in a mated relationship, without any reproductive consequences.

You won't need techniques. You won't need anything but the full acceptance of your freedom to endlessly explore the full range of your sensuality--ALL of your senses--and your desire will be finally free to explore creativity of all kinds of things, without being confined by "rules" as to what is acceptable and what is not.

In full consciousness at all times, you will KNOW and intuitively seek only those expressions that support and celebrate life and support and celebrate the whole of life, in its myriad of forms and expressions. Ecstasy is your natural estate, difficult as that might be to comprehend from your present frame of reference, and the sexual function--employing the full range of all of your senses as it does--will give you the greatest fulfillment of that ecstasy, and so  it will occupy your attention a great deal of the time.

When you are in continuous communication with all of Creation, and in particular with your mate--the other side of your dyadic unit--it will be like "making love" all of the time. Even when you are not in physical proximity, you will be making love with each other. The flow is constant between you, like a dance that never ends, and it will be so for the rest of your journey in this Creation.

You were born together in the mind of the Creator, you are joined together in the mind of the Creator, and you will eternally be together in the mind of the Creator until the inhale is complete and you dissolve your beingness into that of the Creator Itself, ready to be born again into beingness with the next outbreath of Creation. You have much ahead to enjoy, and enjoy it you will, of that we have no doubt. It is time, dear ones, for you to come home--to yourself, to Terra, to the entire spectrum of experience of which you are capable. And is THAT not an idea worth waiting for! WE think so, and know you will agree.

We will leave you now in peace and honor and blessing. Amen, Adonoy Sabayoth. We are the Hosts of Heaven. We shall speak to you again.


© Celestial Cooperatives 1999-2001
Web site: http://www.operationterra.com
e-mail: lyara@operationterra.com

Postal mail address: Lyara c/o Celestial Cooperatives,
PO Box 2231, Oroville, WA 98844 (USA)

The above material may be freely distributed by any means, provided it is not altered in any way and the above copyright and contact information is included with it.


Back to The New Paradigm Index